At half past six I decided we needed a shopping trip. At twenty to seven I decided that decision was mostly fatigue wearing a very convincing coat.

The cupboard contained chickpeas, tomatoes and pasta. The fridge contained half a pepper, a small amount of spinach and a lemon that still had work to do. Dinner was present. It simply had not organized itself into a recipe title.

I softened an onion while making a little list of what needed using. The pepper went in next. Tomatoes made a sauce, chickpeas made it substantial and spinach arrived near the end. The pasta cooked separately. A squeeze of lemon and some chopped parsley made the bowl feel brighter than the contents of the cupboard had suggested.

No quantities here, because this particular supper was a useful response to what I had. I tasted and adjusted. I watched the texture. I made enough for the people at the table, rather than enough to match a photograph.

The lesson in my notebook is a question: what job does each ingredient do? Something substantial, something saucy, something fresh, something that adds a different texture. Thinking that way gives me more options when the exact ingredient in a saved recipe is missing.

It also helps me avoid the everything-in-one-pan disaster. A cupboard dinner is still allowed to have a sequence. Some things need longer. Some things become less pleasant if I leave them there forever. Improvising does not require abandoning my eyes.

We ate. The sink acquired a few dishes. The unopened shopping app remained exactly where it was. I had saved myself a trip, a queue and another opportunity to buy an ingredient whose main purpose would be making next week's cupboard more crowded.

Nisha Bell
About the author

Home cook and recipe tinkerer

I'm based in Toronto, Canada. I write about good dinners from ordinary cupboards and a sink that is already full.

A thought worth keeping?